Comparing the Nintendo Wii with the PS3 and Xbox360

The next generation of game consoles have now arrived, but of the three (Nintendo Wii, PS3 and Xbox360) which is going to win?

Firstly let us have at look at the Nintendo Wii.

This is the most unusual of the three consoles that we are looking at. It comes with an IBM Broadway Processor and ATI Hollywood GPU. Although not as powerful as the Playstation 3 or the Xbox 360 the Wii’s unique game play system and its remote controller make all the difference to playing games with this console.

The controller has the advantage of the player being able to use it as a sword, baseball bat, golf club and even a steering wheel which results in the games being more active and the player is getting some form of exercise to boot.

Another benefit of the Wii is that it has a great load of applications available for it such as Avatar: The Last Airbender, Call of Duty, Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess, Need for Speed: Carbon as well as Wii Play and Wii Sports. They will also being releasing in the future Super Smash Bros Brawl and Pokemon Battle Revolution.

Finally the Wii is backwards compatible with the Nintendo GameCube and can be connected via wireless link to the Nintendo DS or DS Lite, as well as people being able to download Nintendo 64, Super Nintendo, NES, Sega Mega-Drive (Genesis) and Turbo Grafix 16 games for a small price that they can keep and play on this console.

Next we will look at the Xbox 360.

This comes with 3.2GHZ IBM Power PC tri-core processor as well as a 500MHZ GPU. This console is particularly attractive to gamers because of its powerful running speeds, the fast paced online action, and the mind blowing graphics.

Another point in the Xbox 360′s favor is its cost. A core system will set you back $299.99 while a premium system will cost you $399.99. This system has been priced between what you would pay for a PS3 (the most expensive) and the Nintendo Wii (the cheapest).

However a disadvantage of the Xbox360 is, because it does not have a processor in it from the original Xbox, you can not play original Xbox games on it without obtaining additional emulation software from the internet.

Finally let’s look at what the Playstation 3 has to offer.

This is the most expensive of these 3 consoles and it will not be available in Europe or Australia until March 2007. However the Playstation 3 does come with the following for the $499.99: you get 20gb while the $599.99 version has 60gb along with a new Sixaxis controller and Blu-Ray drive. It also has a Cell Broadband Engine (3.2GHZ), IBM Power Based CPU (which is almost equal to the Xbox360) and a 550MHZ RSX GPU. This hardware is perfect for those who like Racing and FPS games.

The PS3 is also compatible with the PSP (Playstation Portable) as well as being compatible with Playstation and Playstation 2 titles and future firmware updates will then make it even more compatible.

So you will have to decide what you want. Do you want the more expensive but powerful PS3 or the average priced yet powerful Xbox360? Or may be you lust after the cheap but unique and highly backward compatible Nintendo Wii? The decision is yours at the end of the day.

Popularity: 4% [?]

Google faces EU probe over data policy

Google has been warned that it may be violating European Union privacy laws by storing search data from its users for up to two years, the latest example of a US technology giant whose practices face a collision with European standards.

An advisory panel of data-protection chiefs from the 27 countries in the EU sent a letter last week to Google asking it to justify its policy of retaining data on Internet addresses and individual search habits, Frisco Roscam Abbing, a spokesman for the European Union’s justice commissioner, Franco Frattini, said.

Privacy excerpts said the latter was the first salvo in what could become a determined effort by the European Commission to force Google to change how it does business in Europe, where the 400 million consumers outnumber those in US.

Any effort to impose limits on Google, which operates under US law, would be the latest in series of increasingly aggressive actions taken by European Policy makers to rein in global technology companies. “Frattini called the working groups query to Google pertinent, appropriate and legitimate,” Abbing said.

According to one member, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorize to speak for the group, the panel is concerned that Google’s retention period is too long and is intended to serve commercial interests.The data is often used to direct advertising to users.

“The discussion is only just beginning,” said Christoph Gusy, a privacy law expert at the University of Bielefeld in Germany. “Pressure to regulate this type of business activity, which is still in its infancy, is building, and what you are seeing is beginning of a serious effort in Europe.

Google describe the committee’s request as reasonable. It noted that the company itself raised the issue with European officials in March by announcing that it was shortening the retention of customer data, which had previously been unlimited, to up to two years.

Other large Search Engines like Yahoo and MSN Search have not disclossed how long they keep user data.

“There can be reasonable arguments for and against keeping server logs for this length of time,” said Peter Fleischer, Google’s global privacy counsel. “But we believe that between 18 and 24 months is a reasonable length of time to balance privacy issues with business concerns.”

In a letter to be sent to the European Union panel, Google will argue that the retention periods are necessary to ward off hackers and prevent Internet advertising fraud, and to improve Google’s search algorithm, Fleischer said. The panel plans to meet on June 19 in Brussels to consider Google’s response.

The most prominent European case against a US technology giant focused on Microsoft, which the European Commission found in 2004 to have violated antitrust laws for using its de facto monopoly Windows Operating System to promote it’s own server software and desktop media players.

The company settled a similar case with American antitrust regulators in 1994.

Microsoft is appealing the commission’s decision. In the meantime, the commission and European competition officials have fined the company nearly $1 billion for failing to comply with the terms of its original order.

Source : TOI (NYTNS)

Popularity: 5% [?]

Back In Time

Who invented the windshield
wiper? Mary Anderson, on a
rainy road trip from Alabama
to New York in 1903,realised
how cumbersome it was for
drivers to stop every few
minutes to wipe moisture off
the windscreen. Mary in-
vented a swinging arm de-
vice with a rubber blade that
the driver could operate from
inside the vehicle via a lever.
Snow, rain, sleet or hail, it
could clean anything with a
swing and a swish. Mary got
this wiper patented in No-
vember 1903. By 1916, it
had become standard equip-
ment on all American cars.

Popularity: 3% [?]